Legal Opinion

Buntrock v. Hoffman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1922PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

Upon the trial of the action plaintiff’s counsel moved to amend the complaint so as to include therein an allegation to the effect that the purchase price of the farm was to be used for the purpose of paying off the incumbrances upon the land, and that by an oversight and the mutual mistake of the parties such agreement was not included in the written document of date of November 30th, the object of such amendment being to reform such agreement. Such amendment was thereupon allowed by the court, and such ruling of the court in that behalf constitutes one of the assignments of error of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McLennan v. PrenticeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McLeod v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State ex rel. City of Superior v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Booth v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Maxon v. GatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Zuelke v. GergoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hope Acres, Inc. v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. De Sombre v. BickelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Long Investment Co. v. O'DONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API