Legal Opinion

Pyne v. Knight

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1906PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Bremer District Court. — 'Hon. Clifford P. Smith, Judge. Suit in equity for the correction and reformation of a deed upon the ground of mutual mistake. Defendant’s answer was practically a general denial. Decree dismissing plaintiff’s petition, and she appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Prior to the execution of the deed which is sought to be reformed, plaintiff, the widow of Wm. H. Mores, deceased, was the owner of various pieces of property in the city of Waverly, including what is known as “ Lot 2,” the property which it is claimed was included in the deed which she seeks to have reformed for mutual mistake. Mitchell and Mattison were by plaintiff appointed agents for the sale of her property as-well as some other matters. They were, it is claimed, instructed not to sell that part of lot 2 upon which the barn stood, as she desired to retain it as a.part of her homestead,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCormack v. MolburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Parker v. KaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Jamison v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Brown v. WardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Stillman v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schwarzbach v. Ohio Valley Protective UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Akkerman v. GersemaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Day v. DyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Galva First National Bank v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API