Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The claimant King registered for work and filed an application for benefits for the week ending January 19, 1955. His claim was denied by the bureau on the ground that the work stoppage was the result of an industrial dispute within §402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802. The referee reversed the bureau on the testimony of the claimant alone. One year later, after hearing the employer’s witnesses, on a remand order of the board, the referee reinstated his original decision and order of April 14, *6311955, awarding benefits as claimed. On the employer’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- General Building Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 542Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Byerly Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Morris Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of BeviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Odgers v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Houck v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Murdoca v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.