Legal Opinion
Odgers v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 1232 C.D. 1983 and 1233 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Ernest Odgers and Arnold Nayowith, representing 22,000 Philadelphia School District employees,1 appeal an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, hereinafter referred to as “Comp Board,” order denying them benefits pursuant to Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law2 because their fifty-one day work stoppage in the Fall of 1981 was found to be a strike and not a lockout.
In this appeal, Odgers and Nayowith contend that the Comp Board capriciously disregarded competent evidence offered on certain factual issues and that the Comp Board erred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- High v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Borello v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Odgers v. Com., Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hoffman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Murdoca v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.