Legal Opinion

Houck v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1979No. Appeal, No. 706 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Ann P. Houck (claimant) has appealed on her own behalf, and on behalf of 29 other claimants, from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Claimant was one of 54 employees of Craig HouseTechnoma Workshop, Inc. (Craig House), a school for emotionally disturbed children. Claimant and some of her fellow employees desired to have the Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 33 (Union) recognized as the exclusive bargaining agent for the employees of Craig House. In August…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Sprague & Henwood, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of BeviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Henley v. Housing Authority for City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Penflex, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API