Legal Opinion
Hogan Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 26, 1951No. Appeal, No. 38PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
So far as is here pertinent, §402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended by the Act of May 23,1949, P. L. 1738, §11, 43 P.S. §802, provides:
“An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week — (d) In which his unemployment Is due to a stoppage of work, which exists because of a labor dispute (other than a lock-out) at the factory, establishment or other premises at which he is- or was last employed. . . .” (Emphasis added.)
There was a labor dispute between the Dravo Corporation and the Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Miners in General Group v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
- Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
- Burger Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Weimer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.