Legal Opinion

Byerly Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeals, 18 to 22PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Claimants, employes of the Westinghouse Electric Corporation at its Trafford Foundry Plant, were refused benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law by the decision of the Bureau which was affirmed by the referee, whose decision was in turn affirmed by the Board of Review. Claimants were disqualified under §402 of the Law, as amended by the Act of May 23, 1949, P. L. 1738, §11, 43 PS §802, which provides, inter alia: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week ... (d) In which his unemployment is due to a stoppage of work, which exists because of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Burger Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Barnes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd. v. AkahaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. TR Miller Mill Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Weimer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Norwin School District v. BelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API