Legal Opinion
Sisney v. Best Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 2008No. 24682PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Charles E. Sisney, an inmate in the South Dakota State Penitentiary (SDSP), filed a pro se complaint against Best Inc., CBM Inc., and William Carl Preyer (Defendants). Sisney asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. He also asserted numerous state law claims. All claims arise out of Best’s and CBM’s contracts with the State to provide food at the SDSP. The circuit court dismissed for failure to state a claim, concluding that Sisney’s complaint was untimely as to Best, and that it failed to allege sufficient facts to support the remaining federal and state…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marcus Davis v. Calzona Hall, Director of Justice Services St. Louis County Jail Mohammad Alam, M.D. Spectrum Emergency CareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Gruhlke v. Sioux Empire Federal Credit Union, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Charles Sisney v. Denny KaemingkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Young v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.