Legal Opinion

Charles Sisney v. Denny Kaemingk

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2018No. 16-4313; 16-4480PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Inmate Charles Sisney brought this pro se civil rights action against four South Dakota corrections officials, asserting both facial and as-applied challenges to the State's prison-pornography policy. The district court construed Sisney's facial challenges to two distinct provisions of the policy as a single attack on the entire policy, and it granted his motion for summary judgment on this score. After invalidating the policy on its face, the court proceeded to resurrect a prior version of the policy and used it to resolve all but one of the as-applied challenges in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Charles Sisney v. Denny KaemingkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Bollinger v. AutoZoners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2024
  3. Douglas Brown v. Todd RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Femi Joseph Daramola v. Dungarvin Minnesota, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  5. Harold Isaac v. Dana CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API