Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 13, 1940No. 5325PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit. The defendant has proposed certain interrogatories which were filed on March 30, 1939, the plaintiffs, on May 1, 1939, answered certain of the interrogatories and filed objections to answering the balance.
One of the purposes of Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, is to obtain admissions, and thereby limit the subjects of controversy that would have to be disposed of on the trial. The new Rules were a great innovation in several of the States and undoubtedly there may be a tendency,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
- Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Landry v. O'Hara Vessels, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. North Carolina Pulp Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938
- Lanova Corporation v. National Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Onofrio v. American Beauty Macaroni Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Porter v. Montaldo'sDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
- Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- American S.S. Co. v. Buckeye S.S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.