Legal Opinion

Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 9, 1944No. Civ. No. 301PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of defendant’s patent No. 1,808,893, coupled with a charge of violation of the AntiTrust Laws, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. Defendant has counterclaimed for infringement of its patent and, also, its trade-mark No. 251,904.

Defendant put twenty-eight interrogatories. Plaintiff answered ten and filed a statement of counsel in answer to ten more, but objected to the eight remaining interrogatories. Defendant countered by objecting to .the ten interrogatories answered by counsel. I dispose of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  2. McCarthy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  3. Byers Theaters, Inc. v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. West Virginia · 1940
  4. Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
  5. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ByrnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  2. Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  3. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  5. Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API