Legal Opinion

Nevis v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1954No. S. F. 19039PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered upon a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in his action to recover for personal injuries resulting when a boom on a hay derrick he was operating on ranch land came into contact with defendant’s high voltage wires. We have concluded that error in the instructions, complained of by defendant, was invited by it, that its other contentions are untenable, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

From the pleadings and the evidence it appears that the hay derrick was of a type in common use in the area in hay loading, and had been operated by its owner,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Harriet McGarry Individually, and as Guardian Ad Litem of Dennis McGarry a Minor v. United States of America, Patricia McGarry Schell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API