Legal Opinion
Broekelschen v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 31, 2011No. 07-137 VPublishedCited by 681 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
On February 21, 2011, petitioner Dr. Peter Broekelschen filed a final application for attorney’s fees and costs (docket entry 85) after his petition for relief under the Vaccine Act was denied. Special Master Christian Moran awarded petitioner a reduced amount of his requested fees and costs. Petitioner now files a motion for review arguing that the special master acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and contrary to law, and abused his discretion when he awarded petitioner fees and costs less than that requested. For the reasons set forth below, the Court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by681 opinions
- Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Guerrero v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Scharfenberger v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- A. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- A.P. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
676 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.