Legal Opinion
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 26, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-12; Court 09-00110PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition (“DSMC”) petitions for award of $73,466.11 (current estimate) in fees and expenses against The United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). DSMC succeeded in obtaining a writ of mandamus from the underlying litigation, and the following explains why award is appropriate.
Background
The overall unfair trade litigation to which the underlying litigation relates provides context. In 2005, DSMC filed an antidumping petition to obtain relief from imported diamond sawblades…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caplash v. NielsenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Gate Guard Services L.P. v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Shah Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.