Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sabo v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 26, 2016No. 08-899CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses Under the EAJA; Antiassignment Act; Prevailing Party; Substantial Justification; Application of VASRD § 4.129 to Service Members Discharged With PTSD; 10 U.S.C. Chapter 61; Adequacy of Supporting Documentation

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Plaintiffs, and the members of the class they represent, were medically separated from the United States military due to post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) resulting from their service in Iraq and Afghanistan during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. In conjunction with their…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  5. BONE v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API