Legal Opinion

Aurenz v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1939No. Civ. No. 11823PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOBK, P. J. —

Appellant sued respondent corporation for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her in a collision between her automobile and a street car of said corporation, which was being operated by the respondent Cox, said accident occurring on February 28, 1936, at the intersection of Future Street and Cypress Avenue in the city of Los Angeles. In the first trial of the cause the jury disagreed and in the second trial a verdict was returned in favor of respondents. The judgment which was thereafter entered was reversed on appeal. (Aurenz v. Los Angeles Ry Corp.,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hedding v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Clayton v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Amendt v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API