Hedding v. Pearson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff, appellant herein, brought this action for damages for personal injuries sustained by him through contact with a truck owned by defendant Pearson and operated by defendant Zentz as the employee of such owner. The defendants filed separate answers denying plaintiff’s allegations of negligence and each set up the affirmative defense of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendants, and from the resulting judgment plaintiff appeals.
The facts of the ease are substantially without…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Scandalis v. JennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- In Re Estate of KinseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Miller v. George F. Cook Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.