Legal Opinion
CARLTON BROWNE & CO. INC. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1989No. B037541PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, Acting P. J.
Presented for resolution in this original proceeding in mandate is the question of whether a corporate defendant’s written waiver of the statute of limitations which is signed by the corporate defendant’s attorney-agent comports with the requirement of Code of Civil Procedure section 360.5 1 that a waiver of the statute of limitations be “signed by the person obligated.” We hold that it does.
Procedural Background
On May 17, 1988, plaintiff and real party in interest Charterhouse Investment Company, a California corporation (Charterhouse), filed a complaint naming…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Broadmoor San Clemente Homeowners Assn. v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- County of Orange v. BARRATT AMERICAN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- California First Bank v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Arkansas Development Finance AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.