Legal Opinion

Sealand Investment Corp. v. Emprise Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1961No. Civ. 24808PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

On August 26, 1959, Sealand Investment Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Sealand”) filed a “Complaint for Diversion of Corporate Assets, Misappropriation of Corporate Opportunities, to Impose a Constructive Trust, for an Accounting, and for Breach of Fiduciary Relationship,” and named as defendants “Emprise Incorporated, a California corporation, Joseph A. Spray and Charles P. Gould, individually, Spray, Gould and Bowers, a partnership composed of Joseph A. Spray, Charles P. Gould and C. W. Bowers, J. P. Shirley, Jr., Gunther J. Shirley, Robert G. Shirley, Joseph A. Shirley, Louise…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. International Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Hardin v. Morgan Lithograph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Rothman & Schneider, Inc. v. BeckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. West View Hills, Inc. v. Lizau Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. American Center for Education, Inc. v. CavnarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Anmaco, Inc. v. BohlkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Glisson Coker, Inc. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Sealand Investment Corp. v. ShirleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API