Legal Opinion
Anmaco, Inc. v. Bohlken
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 1993No. A056632PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOSSEE, J.
Anmaco, Inc., a California corporation, and Mark J. Pearl-man appeal from a judgment dismissing their action against William T. Bohlken and from a subsequent award of attorney fees. We affirm the judgment and order.
Procedural and Factual Background
Pearlman and Bohlken are the sole directors of Anmaco and each owns 50 percent of that corporation’s shares. On November 23, 1987, Pearlman filed an unverified complaint against Bohlken, with Pearlman and Anmaco named as plaintiffs. The first through the ninth causes of action alleged various wrongs committed by Bohlken against the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- DeGrandchamp v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Roberts v. Los Angeles County Bar Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Leibert v. Transworld Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Tippett v. TerichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Belio v. Panorama Optics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.