Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Action to recover from the defendant for certain legal services rendered it by Charles Gr. Nagle, and assigned to the plaintiff. The cause was tried by a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $600. A motion for a new trial was denied, and the defendant has appealed. It is not controverted that Mr. Nagle rendered the services,, nor does the- appellant question their value, but contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that Mr. Nagle was employed by the defendant, and that the services which he did render were not rendered to the defendant, but to another…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Estrada v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Commonwealth v. VoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Shorb v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- McKevitt v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.