Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Morgan Lithograph Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
The complaint alleges that:
“ II. On or about the 1st day of July, 1918, or prior thereto, the defendant promised plaintiff that if plaintiff introduced defendant to Famous Players-Lasky Corporation or officers or agents thereof, and if thereafter defendant secured lithograph business from said Famous Players-Lasky Corporation, defendant would pay plaintiff five (5%) per cent commission on the gross lithograph business which defendant should do with said Famous Players-Lasky Corporation.
“ III. Thereafter and pursuant to said agreement plaintiff did introduce defendant to Famous PlayersLasky…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hastings v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Oakes v. Cattaraugus Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Bradford Belting Co. v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1903
- Peck v. Dexter Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Powers v. Schlicht Heat, Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Kaufmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
- West View Hills, Inc. v. Lizau Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Twyeffort v. Unexcelled Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Goldenberg v. Bartell Broadcasting Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.