In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Chase
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 7-106(A) 1 by failing to comply with a child support order. DR 7-106(A) provides that “[a] lawyer shall not disregard * * * a ruling of a tribunal made in the course of a proceeding * * The accused conceded that he had violated that rule. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated DR 7-106(A) and imposed a public reprimand as a sanction. The Bar sought review, requesting that the accused be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CariniOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- In re No.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.