Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Chase

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2005No. OSB 03-05; SC S51613PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 7-106(A) 1 by failing to comply with a child support order. DR 7-106(A) provides that “[a] lawyer shall not disregard * * * a ruling of a tribunal made in the course of a proceeding * * The accused conceded that he had violated that rule. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated DR 7-106(A) and imposed a public reprimand as a sanction. The Bar sought review, requesting that the accused be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CariniOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re No.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API