Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Birkett

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 7, 2004No. CIV.03-40211PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Paul J. Ko-mives, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Petitioner’s motion.

The Court’s standard of review for a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation depends upon whether a party files objections. If a party does not object to the Report and Recommendation, the Court does not need to conduct a review by any standard. See…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Pillette v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Kelley v. BurtonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Adams v. DavidsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Anderson v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. BURNAM v. CAPOZZADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API