Whalen v. Randle
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
This action stems from a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 that was filed outside of the one-year statute of limitations established under § 2244(d)(1). Petitioner-Appellant, David M. Whalen, argues that he should not be barred by the one-year statute of limitations because of tolling during his state and federal appeals, tolling after his discovery of new evidence, equitable tolling because of inaccurate advice given by the Ohio State Public Defender’s office, and an actual innocence claim. Whalen now appeals from the district…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Charmel Allen v. Joan N. Yukins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Lardie v. BirkettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Jose Jurado, Jr. v. Sherry BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ian Davis v. Margaret BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Redmond v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.