Legal Opinion

Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 31, 1974No. 1005-2PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

This appeal is concerned with cross actions arising out of the sale of a Tacoma retail sporting goods business — Ski Hut Honda. Plaintiff, John Jarstad, sold that business in the late fall of 1970 to defendants Charles Woodke and Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc. In connection with the sale, defendants, by separate instrument, agreed to employ plaintiff “as a consultant” for 5 years at a monthly salary of $800. Plaintiff was to serve in “an advisory capacity only in consulting and promoting the business of Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.” An additional stated consideration for the employment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ringstad v. I. Magnin & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Ladley v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Baum v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Armco Steel Corp. v. Isaacson Structural Steel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. American Fertilizer Specialists, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Hudson v. Town & Country True Value Hardware, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Branden v. GerbieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Jeffries v. Clark's Restaurant Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API