Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Town & Country True Value Hardware, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Chief Justice.

The issue before the Court is the applicability of Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code (T.C.A. §§ 47-2-101 et seq.) to a sale that involved a going business where the assets sold included both “goods” as defined in the U.C.C.1 and “non-goods.”

I

Plaintiff, as seller, and defendant, as purchaser, entered into two separate contracts, one for the sale of real estate at $227,500 and the other for the sale of stock and fixtures of the business known as Hudson Hardware for $60,000.

The real estate contract was contingent upon buyer assuming an S.B.A. loan of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosemary Foster v. Colorado Radio Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  2. Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Miller v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Monetti, S.P.A., and Melform U.S.A., Inc. v. Anchor Hocking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen TanzerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  3. Morgan Publications, Inc. v. Squire Publishers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In Re Maryville Savings & Loan Corporation, Debtor. Peoples Bank of Polk County v. John E. McDonald TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Pittsley v. HouserIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API