Baum v. Murray

This action was commenced by respondents against appellant and a party whose identity was unknown to recover a judgment for damages alleged to have been sustained because of consumption of sausage sold by appellant. The case was tried before a jury resulting in a verdict for respondents. Motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial were made by appellant and. denied by the court, and from .the judgment entered on the verdict this appeal has been taken. The respondents have taken a cross-appeal from the judgment.

The theory of the complaint was that appellant, a retail…