Legal Opinion

State v. Justesen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1909No. 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Seventh District. Hon. Ferdinand Ericlcson, Judge. Defendant convicted of subornation of perjury appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McCarty, j.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of subornation of perjury. The information, so far as material here, alleged that on and prior to the 4th day of June, 1907, a certain action was pending before the district court of Sanpete county, this State, wherein one Jacob Johnson was plaintiff and one Niels Peter Nielson was defendant, “and in which case the issues were as to whether certain notes executed by the said Niels Peter Nielson to the order of Alexander Justesen, the defendant herein, and to' him, the said Alexander Justesen, delivered, were fraudulently retained and sold by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  3. People v. MacardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Higgenbotham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. State v. GleasonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State of S. Dak. v. BachelorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  5. United States v. HumbleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API