Legal Opinion

State of S. Dak. v. Bachelor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1940No. File No. 8275PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of the crime of grand larceny; appellant being charged with being an accessory before the fact. The property stolen was a two year old heifer alleged to have been the property of one Birthol B. Brown. The actual taking of said heifer was by one James D. Cole. The information upon which appellant was tried originally contained three counts, but the trial court sustained a demurrer to count 3 and the state dismissed count 2. The charging part of count 1 upon which appellant was tried reads as follows:

“Comes now John Geo. Day, the duly elected,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. People v. . GrutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. People v. RozelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State v. WolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. BowkerOregon Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. HoughtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. ZeminaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. DouglasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. New v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API