United States v. Humble
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*40Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused was tried and convicted of larceny. The question before us is whether he was prejudiced by improper conduct of trial counsel.
Appellant was charged with acting in conjunction with Private Ronald E. Goodwin. At trial, the prosecution called two witnesses who were implicated with the accused in the transaction. One was Goodwin. He testified that he helped the accused collect clothing of recruits belonging to the accused’s company, and that together with the accused he extracted money from the clothing and shared in the proceeds. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. DomenechUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. BacaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. PlanterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. SlamskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.