In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*1160ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINTS
Re: Dkt. No. 139
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the alleged antitrust and anticompetitive impact of a July 2012 settlement agreement between defendants Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teikoku Seiya-ku Co., Teikoku Pharma USA (collectively “Endo defendants”) and defendant Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively “defendants”), which terminated Watson’s patent litigation lawsuit against the Endo defendants in exchange for the provision of brand-name…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- In re Dealer Management Systems Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.