Legal Opinion
Wahad v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1998No. 75 Civ. 6203(MJL)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of defendants City of New York and Michael Codd (collectively “Defendants”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) (“Rule 56(e)”), to strike certain portions of the affidavit of Robert J. Bloom, Esq. (“Bloom Affidavit”) submitted by Plaintiff Dhouruba Bin Wahad (“Plaintiff’) in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Specifically, Defendants ask the Court to strike paragraphs 8-44, 46-50, and 62-64 of the Bloom Affidavit. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is granted in part…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schwapp v. Town of AvonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- The Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd. v. William Gluckin & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Montefiore Medical Center v. American Protection InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Federal Trade Commission v. Vantage Point Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- 360Heros, Inc. v. Mainstreet America Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.