Legal Opinion
H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 3, 1991No. 1099, Docket 90-7879PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
This appeal centers on the date of delivery of four chillers used in the air conditioning system at the New York Port Authority Bus Terminal Building in Manhattan. Unlike beauty, the delivery of property is not in the eye of the beholder. That is a subjective notion, while the transfer of goods occurs when the facts of delivery are objectively established.
The appellant, H. Sand & Co., Inc. (Sand), ordered the chillers in 1977 from the appel-lee, Airtemp Corporation, in fulfillment of Sand’s sub-contract with the general contractor, Carlin-Atlas Joint Venture, to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- City of New York v. Pullman Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Patterson v. County of OneidaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Michael Sarno v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc., Insignia Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Cruden v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Angel Santos v. John M. Murdock, Luisa St. Pierre, Linworth Jones, John Koch, Andrew Jaffe, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Village Green Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.