Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Sonderen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1987No. OSB 85-5; SC S31701PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney discipline case. The primary issue is whether the accused is subject, under the facts of this case, to discipline pursuant to ORS 9.527(2), which provides, in pertinent part:

“The Supreme Court may disbar, suspend or reprimand a member of the bar whenever, upon proper proceedings for that purpose, it appears to the court that:

((>|c * * * *

“(2) The member has been convicted in any jurisdiction of an offense which is a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or a felony under the laws of this state, or is punishable by death or imprisonment under the laws of the United States,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ex parte TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DintelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. RodarteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API