Legal Opinion
State v. Rodarte
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 21, 2001No. CF980340, CF980144 A105240 (Control), A105284PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
In this consolidated appeal arising out of two charges of felony driving while suspended (FDWS), the state challenges orders excluding the evidence that defendant’s driving privileges were suspended at the time in question. The only issue presented is whether ORS 809.410(4) authorizes suspension of a driver’s license for a felony vehicular conviction 1 that has been reduced to a misdemeanor pursuant to ORS 161.705(1). The trial court concluded that it does not. We agree, and affirm.
The relevant facts are procedural in nature. Defendant previously pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Vasquez v. CourtneyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Mannelin v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. DintelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. TurntineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.