Northland Casualty Co. v. Meeks
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
The estate and heirs of Floyd Meeks (collectively “Meeks”) and Rocky Harrell appeal the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to Northland Casualty Company (“Northland”). The district court held that Harrell’s commercial insurance policy with Northland that provided business auto coverage (“the Policy”) did not cover claims arising from the fatal injuries suffered by Floyd Meeks (“Floyd”) because it determined that Floyd was Harrell’s employee. On appeal, Meeks and Harrell argue that the Policy covered their claims because Floyd was either an independent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- GAVAN v. Bituminous Casualty CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AllenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Blankenship v. OverholtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Source Food Technology, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- John Gohagan v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Christensen v. QuinnDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Hickey v. BOMERSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.