Legal Opinion
Eisenrod v. Utley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1954No. 13547PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The above named Trustee in Bankruptcy brought an action, designated one “to set aside and avoid fraudulent conveyances made by the bankrupt”, against the appellants, and recovered a money judgment from which this appeal is taken. Appellants present but one contention: that this is not truly an action to set aside fraudulent transfers; rather that it was an action to recover damages for certain tortious acts of the defendants in despoiling the bankrupt corporation. Hence it is said, the action is not one authorized by § 70, sub. e of the Bankruptcy Act to be brought in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Schumacher v. BeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Park v. CameronSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pettit v. American Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Pereira v. Checkmate Communications Co. (In Re Checkmate Stereo & Electronics, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- McDonnell v. American Leduc Petroleums, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Glenn D. Bartle, Trustee of Markson Bros., Inc. Now Known as M B H, Inc. v. Asher S. MarksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Filliben v. JacksonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.