Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Beeler
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 17, 1934No. 215PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
In granting the writ of certiorari, we limited our review to the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under § 23 (b) of the Bankruptcy Act. That provision, and its immediate context, § 23 (a), are set forth in the margin. 1 44 Stat. 664; 11 U. S. C., § 46 (a) (b).
This is, a plenary suit brought by respondent, trustee in bankruptcy, in the District Court to enjoin the sale of certain property, alleged to be fixtures, attached to the manufacturing plant of the bankrupt, which petitioner, as sheriff, was threatening to sell under an execution issued more than four months prior to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brown v. GerdesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.