Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action to recover damages for fraud. Plaintiff has a verdict against all three defendants for $11,900. Defendants Union Loan & Finance Company (to be referred to hereinafter as the Union company) and Charles W. Sterling moved separately for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial, and each appeals from the order denying the motion. No such motion was made by defendant Erickson, who is no party to these appeals.
Plaintiff pleads but one cause of action, based on the several transactions herein considered. Assuming fraud in each of them, they would constitute ordinarily separate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Melady v. South St. Paul Live Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Lange v. HeckelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Seitz v. FreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.