Seitz v. Frey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff brought this action for damages on the ground that he had been induced to sell 294 shares of the capital stock of the Central Supply Company to defendant Frey at less than its value by the fraudulent misconduct and misrepresentations of the defendants. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court dismissed the action as to defendant Michel, and at the close of the trial the jury returned a verdict for defendant Frey. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The record and briefs are somewhat lengthy but the questions meriting consideration are few and simple.
Th…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Miller v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- PJ Acquisition Corp. v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Bisbee v. Midland Linseed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Llewellyn v. Queen City Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.