Legal Opinion

State v. Burns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1943No. 33,336PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The defendants, Neil J. Cook, Robert J. Burns, and L. J. Seiberlich, copartners doing business as the Bureau of Credit Control, were indicted for having conspired on August 6, 1941, to cheat and defraud one John F. Theisen by means of false representations that they had for collection an account against him on which he owed one Forner $61.90; that, although the amount due on said account on May 1, 1941, was $30, it had become $61.90 because Theisen had been dilatory in making payment; that defendants were authorized to bring an action against Theisen and his wife to enforce…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Ballantine v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Landen v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Sisson v. TriplettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. St. ChristopherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API