Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1934No. Nos. 29,901, 29,902PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 255 N.W. 113. The plaintiff as beneficiary brought suit on a policy of insurance upon the life of Henry Wallis Sherman, her husband, who disappeared about four months after taking out the policy and paying the first annual premium thereon. The defendant denied that the insured was dead and also alleged that the cause of action set forth in the complaint accrued more than six years before its commencement. The plaintiff had a verdict, and the defendant has appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

The policy of insurance…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Knuth v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Hagsten v. SimbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Jensen v. LinnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API