Legal Opinion

Com. v. J. Irland Smith and Wesson 9MM Semi-Automatic Pistol, Serial PDW0493

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 2017No. Appeal of: Justen Irland 448 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JUDGE McCULLOUGH

The dispositive question presented on appeal is whether the doctrine of common law forfeiture exists in Pennsylvania and can serve as a legal basis to allow the Commonwealth to forfeit any property with a “nexus” to a crime absent any statutory authority to do so. We conclude that common law forfeiture, as that concept originated and developed in England, was never incorporated into or became part of our Commonwealth’s common law tradition. Based upon our research, the Commonwealth’s organic law, namely Article 9, Sections 18 and 19 of the Pennsylvania Constitution…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Irland, J (Semi-Auto Pistol)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Sourovelis v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. A.C. Bender v. DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. I.B. PearsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API