United States v. Slusser
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Proceeding by the United States against Harry Slusser. On application for return of property seized without warrant.
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, District Judge.
On application for the return of property seized without warrant. Slusser has been bound over to await the action of the grand jury on the charge of illegal transportation of liquor. His automobile, loaded with liquor, was seized in his garage by prohibi*819tion agents. He disclaims knowledge and ownership of the liquor, but that the results of the search may not be used in evidence against him, and in order to regain his automobile, he petitions for its return.
Two prohibition officers and two city policemen went to his residence, knocked, and were admitted. One of the agents…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Judd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.