Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 7, 2000No. 43590-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

— Twenty-three months passed between the time the Snohomish County prosecutor charged Brenda Anderson with a felony and the time she was arraigned. Anderson sought dismissal of the charges, arguing that the State did not act with due diligence to locate her. But Anderson’s failure to receive notice of her arraignment was not caused by any lack of diligence on the part of the State; the principal fault was hers. The State concedes that Anderson’s whereabouts were easily ascertainable during the last 2 months of the 23-month delay period because she *408appeared in court on another criminal matter.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API