Legal Opinion
State v. Hudson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1996No. Nos. 63445-9; 63611-7PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— In each of these cases, the defendants were out of the state after they were charged with committing crimes in Washington. Each now argues that his right to *50a speedy trial under CrR 3.3 was violated. We conclude the defendants’ rights were not violated and affirm the convictions.
HUDSON FACTS
Thomas Hudson was arrested in December 1989 for possession of a controlled substance with intent to manufacture or deliver. He was released when no charges were immediately filed and the matter remained under investigation. On June 29, 1990, before any charges were filed, the Snohomish County Prosecuting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- City of Seattle v. GuayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Seattle v. GuayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.