Legal Opinion

State v. Carson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1996No. 62512-3PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

— Petitioner Richard Carson seeks review of an unpublished decision by the Court of Appeals, Division Three, affirming his conviction of rape in the first degree in the Superior Court of Okanogan County and a ruling by the trial court which denied Petitioner’s motion to dismiss, even though his case was not brought to trial within the 60 days required by the "speedy trial” rule, Superior Court Criminal Rule 3.3. We granted review. We affirm.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

The questions presented in this case are: (1) whether the trial court acted properly in retroactively granting multiple five-day trial…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1996

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API