Legal Opinion

La Mancha Development Corp. v. Sheegog

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1978No. Civ. 17948PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Insofar as defendants Sheegog (defendants) are concerned, plaintiff instituted this action to reform a deed by inserting therein a covenant for restricted use of the property conveyed and to enjoin defendants, who were the named grantees, from conveying the property to any person unwilling to abide by the restrictive covenant. Summary judgment was entered in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Prior to January 9, 1975, plaintiff was the owner of two contiguous parcels of real property located at the southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Newland Street in the City of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tyre v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Thompson v. StoakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. FrisoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Laflin & LaflinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. American Home Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Garcia v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API