Jones v. Percy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The defendants here properly gave notice of their intention to assert that the foreclosure deed relied on by plaintiff was insufficient to pass title to him by alleging that “such sale was invalid and not made in accordance with the directions and provisions of the law . . There was no motion to require defendants to particularize or make their general allegation more specific. In the trial defendants confined their attack on this deed to evidence of want of proper advertisement. An issue directed to this defense was submitted to the jury without exception. Hence plaintiff is not now in a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Toler v. . FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Great Southern Media, Inc. v. McDowell CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Bumgarner v. CorpeningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Denson v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- DeBruhl v. L. Harvey & Son Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.